One Morning I Shot An Elephant In My Pajamas Ambiguity

One morning i shot an elephant in my pajamas ambiguity The most natural interpretation is the first one.

One morning i shot an elephant in my pajamas ambiguity. Syntactic ambiguity incrementality and local coherence. Animal crackers is a 1930 american pre code marx brothers comedy film directed by victor heerman the film stars the marx brothers groucho chico harpo and zeppo with lillian roth and margaret dumont it was based on their broadway musical of the same name in which mayhem and zaniness ensue when a valuable painting goes missing during a party in honor of famed african explorer captain. How he got into my pajamas i ll never know groucho marx. When you read that first sentence you probably assume that the prepositional phrase in my pajamas is adverbial telling how or under what conditions groucho marx shot an elephant.

Demonstrations of ambiguity between alternative syntactic structures underlying a sentence. How he got into my pajamas i ll never know. One morning i shot an elephant in my pajamas. The sentence can be read in two ways.

Consider the sentence i once shot an elephant in my pajamas. Ambiguity produced when it is not clear whether a word refers to a group collectively or to members of the group individually. Time flies like an arrow. The second is quite fantastic yet from the next sentence we learn that the author had exactly this interpretation in mind.

This morning i shot an elephant in my pajamas identify the type of ambiguity. Fruit flies like a banana. In this joke the first sentence has two meanings. How he got in my pajamas i don t know.

Pointing to naming or otherwise identifying one or more examples of the term being defined. One morning i shot an elephant in my pajamas. Or one morning an elephant was wearing my pajamas and i shot that elephant. How he got into my pajamas i ll never know.